<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on peer review and blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.repec.org/2007/11/15/more-on-peer-review-and-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.repec.org/2007/11/15/more-on-peer-review-and-blogging/</link>
	<description>Information about Research Papers in Economics (RePEc)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The RePEc blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Promoting academic blogs in Economics</title>
		<link>http://blog.repec.org/2007/11/15/more-on-peer-review-and-blogging/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The RePEc blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Promoting academic blogs in Economics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 01:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repec.org/blog/?p=16#comment-133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] discussion on this blog (1, 2) covered the issue of peer review of new research, in particular now that the Internet has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion on this blog (1, 2) covered the issue of peer review of new research, in particular now that the Internet has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to Econ Academics &#171; Econ Academics Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.repec.org/2007/11/15/more-on-peer-review-and-blogging/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Welcome to Econ Academics &#171; Econ Academics Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repec.org/blog/?p=16#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This is not a traditional blog, as it mainly serves as a portal to other blogs. As was discussed (1, 2) a while ago on the RePEc blog, there is currently little in the Economics profession in terms [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is not a traditional blog, as it mainly serves as a portal to other blogs. As was discussed (1, 2) a while ago on the RePEc blog, there is currently little in the Economics profession in terms [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emanuele Canegrati</title>
		<link>http://blog.repec.org/2007/11/15/more-on-peer-review-and-blogging/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emanuele Canegrati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repec.org/blog/?p=16#comment-132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree. In my opinion the e-review system is the future. I think that it is the same process which is taking place in newspapers&#039; business. People are abandoning paper and are going on line: more articles, possibility to interact, more democratic monitoring system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. In my opinion the e-review system is the future. I think that it is the same process which is taking place in newspapers&#8217; business. People are abandoning paper and are going on line: more articles, possibility to interact, more democratic monitoring system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
